NAME = Sachinobu ISHIDA ORGANIZATION = Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Hirosaki University ADDRESS = Bunkyo-cho 3, Hirosaki, Aomori 036-8561 COUNTRY = Japan PHONE = +81-172-39-3621 FAX = +81-172-39-3621 E-MAIL = ishida@cc.hirosaki-u.ac.jp POSTER_ONLY = no THEME = T1 DATE = 09-Aug-04-11:10:47 ABSID = T1SI09Aug04111047 TITLE = Surface Heat Balance using Flux Measurement Array during Catch A Plume by SATs (CAPS) IOP AUTHOR_1 = Sachinobu ISHIDA INSTITUTION_1 = Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Hirosaki University PRESENTER = AUTHOR_1 AUTHOR_2 = Kenji TANAKA INSTITUTION_2 = Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University AUTHOR_3 = Atsushi HIGUCHI INSTITUTION_3 = Hydrospheric Atmospheric Research Center, Nagoya University AUTHOR_4 = Ichiro TAMAGAWA INSTITUTION_4 = River Basin Research Center, Gifu University AUTHOR_5 = Dai MATUSHIMA INSTITUTION_5 = Graduate school of Science, Tohoku University AUTHOR_6 = CAPS2002-2003 observation group INSTITUTION_6 = Many Affiliations ABSTRACT = The intensive meteorological observation, CAPS (Catch A Plume by SATs), was carried out twice over postharvest paddy field in northern Shiga prefecture, JAPAN in 2002, 2003. The objective of this project is to understand 1) the distribution of the sensible heat flux over homogeneous surface, and 2) it's influence for surface heat balance; 3) the behavior of the plume, which affects the temporal and spatial distribution of the sensible heat flux. The SATs array and the scintillometers were installed to measure the heterogeneity of the heat flux, with other instruments to complete the surface energy balance. Also surface temperature images were taken by the infrared camera from airplane. And the upper ABL sounding was held using a radio sonde, two SODARs and a lidar. This study is focused on the objective 1) and 2). In CAPS2002, the distance of each SAT was O(100m), and the array was extended 500x1500m horizontally using 16 SATs. The heat balance closure ratio was about 60%. The difference between max. and min. sensible heat flux was almost equal to the random error, and was about 30% of mean flux (77W/m^2) during 9-15 local time in clear condition, and the difference seems to be correspond to the surface temperature distribution. But this difference still does not explain the absence of heat. In CAPS2003, the distance of each SAT was O(10m), and the array was extended 100x200m horizontally using 17 SATs. The difference ratio of the sensible heat flux was smaller than CAPS2002. And the heat balance closure ratio was about 100% by averaging data of the multiple measurement sites.